I could be wrong but diversity recruitments only come into play when candidates are already both qualified. There’s no scenario where an unqualified applicant is given priority over one who is.
However, you can be sure that JimCrow states and others gave opportunity to under qualified whites and the sky didn’t fall.
I respectfully disagree. I am close to people in the sickness industry who have openly told me of DEI directly compromising them as otherwise best qualified.
I guess you don't keep up on the news. First, since 1995 they have changed and basically dumb down the SATs several times or therefore reducing the criteria to be accepted to universities and colleges in the first place. Here is a Reddit discussion of these changes:
Here is an article talking about how they lowered the standards in medical school also, although he is hopeful for the future now that DEI quotas criteria for admission to universities has been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
Plus in the 1940s through the 1970s, at least, the Ivy League universities and other top universities had quotas to limit the number of Jews who could be accepted, although they generally scored the highest on all the tests. Then in the last few decades it became Asian students who were subjected to quota limits, as they scored higher than the other students.
One indication of this I only started seeing in the last year when I read articles on some medical subjects on the websites of the Mayo clinic or the Cleveland clinic, is thast I would see phrases like, "For people born with a uterus...", and "For people born with a penis... And also, "For people assigned female at birth..." and "For people assigned male at birth.
This is from Wikipedia:
Sex assignment is the discernment of an infant's sex at birth, usually based on the phenotypic sex. It is also referred to as gender assignment.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders maintained by the American Psychiatric Association, the result is referred to as birth-assigned sex or birth-assigned gender, while the terms assigned sex and assigned gender include later assignments or reassignments during infancy and early childhood, as they are common in intersex people.
The terminology used in the manual has evolved over its editions. The third edition of the manual used the term "anatomic sex". The term assigned sex was introduced into the manual in the fourth edition, published in 1994. However, the terms biological sex and natal gender were also used in the fourth and fifth editions, as well as the term assigned sex. The manual was updated to only use the terminology of sex assignment in the 2022 text revision.
I could be wrong but diversity recruitments only come into play when candidates are already both qualified. There’s no scenario where an unqualified applicant is given priority over one who is.
However, you can be sure that JimCrow states and others gave opportunity to under qualified whites and the sky didn’t fall.
I respectfully disagree. I am close to people in the sickness industry who have openly told me of DEI directly compromising them as otherwise best qualified.
They get around that by lowering the standards for everyone, so everyone, so there are more "equally" qualified diversity candidates.
That’s very unbelievable. How would you even know that? It just isn't plausible.
I guess you don't keep up on the news. First, since 1995 they have changed and basically dumb down the SATs several times or therefore reducing the criteria to be accepted to universities and colleges in the first place. Here is a Reddit discussion of these changes:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Sat/comments/12h21nh/sats_from_20_years_ago_vs_sats_of_today/
Here is an article talking about how they lowered the standards in medical school also, although he is hopeful for the future now that DEI quotas criteria for admission to universities has been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2023/07/06/race-based-admission-medical-schools-was-dangerous-good-riddance-17173
Plus in the 1940s through the 1970s, at least, the Ivy League universities and other top universities had quotas to limit the number of Jews who could be accepted, although they generally scored the highest on all the tests. Then in the last few decades it became Asian students who were subjected to quota limits, as they scored higher than the other students.
Obama did great damage to our country, the NOT affordable health care act just one example. Now Biden is carrying the damage further.
How about giving us a LINK TO THE GLENN BECK PODCAST on which many of your comments are based?
https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/2cdad2c9-f5fa-4df6-9790-e315fd51b52b/the-glenn-beck-program?ref_=dmm_acq_mrn_d_ds_rhsr_z_-c_c_645517264513_t_dsa-1789241054796 for audio. If you are interested in video podcast, you might have to subscribe at www.Blazetv.com
One indication of this I only started seeing in the last year when I read articles on some medical subjects on the websites of the Mayo clinic or the Cleveland clinic, is thast I would see phrases like, "For people born with a uterus...", and "For people born with a penis... And also, "For people assigned female at birth..." and "For people assigned male at birth.
This is from Wikipedia:
Sex assignment is the discernment of an infant's sex at birth, usually based on the phenotypic sex. It is also referred to as gender assignment.
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders maintained by the American Psychiatric Association, the result is referred to as birth-assigned sex or birth-assigned gender, while the terms assigned sex and assigned gender include later assignments or reassignments during infancy and early childhood, as they are common in intersex people.
The terminology used in the manual has evolved over its editions. The third edition of the manual used the term "anatomic sex". The term assigned sex was introduced into the manual in the fourth edition, published in 1994. However, the terms biological sex and natal gender were also used in the fourth and fifth editions, as well as the term assigned sex. The manual was updated to only use the terminology of sex assignment in the 2022 text revision.
Allopathic medicine is going down the tubes and has been since it was corporatized.