Personally, I don't cite this kind of ecological data as evidence of vaccines causing cancer because the curves start bending upwards in 2020, before vaccines. It's not really new info as cumulative excess all-cause mortality (which should always drop back to zero following the end of an abnormal event like covid) has remained elevated all over the world. Certainly vaccines ought to be a leading suspect there, but it's all mixed up with lockdown harms, etc.
In any case, a lot of recent papers seem to describe plausible mechanisms of causing cancer:
Are you discussing the nano technology in the blood? Or ignoring it? The proof can no longer be denied.
Because that's the real issue at hand & we need all hands on deck if we even have a chance of survival.
Personally, I don't cite this kind of ecological data as evidence of vaccines causing cancer because the curves start bending upwards in 2020, before vaccines. It's not really new info as cumulative excess all-cause mortality (which should always drop back to zero following the end of an abnormal event like covid) has remained elevated all over the world. Certainly vaccines ought to be a leading suspect there, but it's all mixed up with lockdown harms, etc.
In any case, a lot of recent papers seem to describe plausible mechanisms of causing cancer:
https://makismd.substack.com/p/turbo-cancer-literature-is-growing