It seems the long term effects of these shots are rather insidious , only becoming apparent with the passage of time when it is harder to make the connection of cause and effect!
Absolutely, we have been hijacked by terrorists. The covid plandemic was designed to coerce us into giving up rights. There is no legality, nor constitutionality to any of the government's actions. An emergency directive, whether from the health dept or the governor, is legally limited in time to 30 days in most states. So the ill-advised mask mandates and closing of businesses both expired and beyond the initial period, during which they where essentially illegal, they were then patently illegal. Beyond that, the use of force or coercion to accept experimental medicine is a capitol offense under international law, as well as being illegal under US federal law.
The only question I have, is when do we start the prosecutions and the executions?
Furthermore, the very production of dangerous biologics violates three international treaties, as well as American law. People need to understand that SARS and SARS 2.0 were both created by Ralph Baric and UNCCH, with funding from Fauci. These people have seen Hitler's evil and raised him. Simple execution is too good for any of them, but an eternity in hell will have to suffice.
So Dr McCullough says 4-8% but the study implies it's most people who took the vax. Or is the effect so large in the 4% that it creates a significant result?
I am tending to rely on experts who have shown consistent "rightness" in this matter. I met with McCullough at a fund raising dinner for CHildren's Health Defense. I think he is extremely credible. I disagree a bit on the treatments. He has his methods coming from Western medicine. I have mine coming from integrative and ozone medicine. But that is a minor point.
Thank you. I agree. We had dinner with him at a Children's Health Defense fund raiser. I encouraged him to consider ozone and gave him materials. He was trained only in western medicine and while we might agree to disagree on medical approaches, he deserves all the respect in the world for challenging orthodoxy over the disease. And for a western medical mind, his ideas on treatment are wonderful.
Is it possible that the damage is not permanent? In the "Discussion" section at the end of the paper: "In our study, patients who underwent imaging 1–180 days after their second vaccination showed elevated myocardial 18F-FDG [the glucose marker] uptake on PET/CT scans compared with nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged more than 180 days after vaccination did not. A recent cardiac MRI study reported a similar pattern of myocardial injury between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine–associated myocardial inflammation and other causes of myocardial inflammation but found that vaccine-related myocardial abnormalities were less severe (13). Thus, even though vaccinated patients in this study showed elevated myocardial 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT scans up to 180 days after vaccination, this could result from relatively minor inflammation and may not represent severe myocardial abnormalities."
Absolutely. However, initial studies found spike protein present for "up to" so many days or weeks and subsequent studies found it present for many months. On the other hand, ANY inflammation in the heart is NOT good. Any inflammation at any time, and Dr. Peter McCullough, cardiologist, says that inflammation now can lead to problems later.
It is well documented that the heart, the only muscle in your body that NEVER rests —perhaps by virtue of that limitation — DOES NOT recover from such damage. While some healing may take place, current studies show that sufferers can NEVER consider their hearts as normal and should live out their lives cautiously avoiding the types of strain and vigorous activity that might tax their hearts and trigger a potentially fatal event.
I don't know what that is but when I search the title nothing relevant comes up with duckduckgo or Google, and with Google when it's in quotation marks, nothing at all comes up.
It seems the long term effects of these shots are rather insidious , only becoming apparent with the passage of time when it is harder to make the connection of cause and effect!
Absolutely, we have been hijacked by terrorists. The covid plandemic was designed to coerce us into giving up rights. There is no legality, nor constitutionality to any of the government's actions. An emergency directive, whether from the health dept or the governor, is legally limited in time to 30 days in most states. So the ill-advised mask mandates and closing of businesses both expired and beyond the initial period, during which they where essentially illegal, they were then patently illegal. Beyond that, the use of force or coercion to accept experimental medicine is a capitol offense under international law, as well as being illegal under US federal law.
The only question I have, is when do we start the prosecutions and the executions?
Furthermore, the very production of dangerous biologics violates three international treaties, as well as American law. People need to understand that SARS and SARS 2.0 were both created by Ralph Baric and UNCCH, with funding from Fauci. These people have seen Hitler's evil and raised him. Simple execution is too good for any of them, but an eternity in hell will have to suffice.
So Dr McCullough says 4-8% but the study implies it's most people who took the vax. Or is the effect so large in the 4% that it creates a significant result?
I am tending to rely on experts who have shown consistent "rightness" in this matter. I met with McCullough at a fund raising dinner for CHildren's Health Defense. I think he is extremely credible. I disagree a bit on the treatments. He has his methods coming from Western medicine. I have mine coming from integrative and ozone medicine. But that is a minor point.
Thank you. I agree. We had dinner with him at a Children's Health Defense fund raiser. I encouraged him to consider ozone and gave him materials. He was trained only in western medicine and while we might agree to disagree on medical approaches, he deserves all the respect in the world for challenging orthodoxy over the disease. And for a western medical mind, his ideas on treatment are wonderful.
Is it possible that the damage is not permanent? In the "Discussion" section at the end of the paper: "In our study, patients who underwent imaging 1–180 days after their second vaccination showed elevated myocardial 18F-FDG [the glucose marker] uptake on PET/CT scans compared with nonvaccinated patients, but patients imaged more than 180 days after vaccination did not. A recent cardiac MRI study reported a similar pattern of myocardial injury between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine–associated myocardial inflammation and other causes of myocardial inflammation but found that vaccine-related myocardial abnormalities were less severe (13). Thus, even though vaccinated patients in this study showed elevated myocardial 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT scans up to 180 days after vaccination, this could result from relatively minor inflammation and may not represent severe myocardial abnormalities."
Absolutely. However, initial studies found spike protein present for "up to" so many days or weeks and subsequent studies found it present for many months. On the other hand, ANY inflammation in the heart is NOT good. Any inflammation at any time, and Dr. Peter McCullough, cardiologist, says that inflammation now can lead to problems later.
It is well documented that the heart, the only muscle in your body that NEVER rests —perhaps by virtue of that limitation — DOES NOT recover from such damage. While some healing may take place, current studies show that sufferers can NEVER consider their hearts as normal and should live out their lives cautiously avoiding the types of strain and vigorous activity that might tax their hearts and trigger a potentially fatal event.
Startpage uses Google search results.
I don't know what that is but when I search the title nothing relevant comes up with duckduckgo or Google, and with Google when it's in quotation marks, nothing at all comes up.