Dear Subscriber,
As you know the Fraud and Deception Administration (FDA) attempted to do a 75-year cover up of its collusion with the genetic jab maker, Pfizer. The federal court slammed the FDA demanding compliance with FOIA requests for disclosure. The FDA began releasing the documents they had planned to bury for most of a century. A kind reader of this column sent me the booklet of the disclosed documents. The following is a summary of the first releases.
It is alarming to compare what you were told by government, Pharma, “Experts”, and the FDA with what is revealed in these documents. Heads should roll, LITERALLY. The LEFTISTS in government and politics seem to get away with murder, again - literally). Those of my ilk were destroyed by the government social media and mainstream press collusion. I see the same thing happening again in election coverage.
Well, below I have transcribed the document word for word with regards to its summary. Most of what you will read below, I covered in individual posts here, well ahead of you getting this disclosure from the Fraud Administration. Yet guys like me were taken out for bringing you truth. Now you get it from the suppressed documents the FDA already held, yet went forward with its EUA and ultimately – forced genetic alteration of the overwhelming majority of the population.
Seems the Pied Piper
took command of our nation.
I had considered putting this in the Premium section, but since the book was freely given to me to share with my readers, I am freely sharing it with you. I do appreciate all of you being here, and certainly am grateful for the Premium readers for their additional support of my Substack.
To Your Excellent Health and Never Again be Tricked!
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Source: “PFIZER DOCUMENTS ANALYSIS REPORTS”
Background
The Food and Drug Administration asked the federal court to allow them 75 years to publicly release Pfizer.COVID-19 vaccine data submitted to the agency.
The court ordered the FDA to immediately begin releasing 55,000 pages of the Pfizer vaccine data per month into the public domain.
This report draws from the original analysis of the war room/Daily clout team of over 3000 expert volunteers who analyze the documents released today, including:
1. Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data
2. Pfizer, real world data during the first 12 weeks of its COVID-19 rollout from December one, 2020, through February 28, 20 2021.
EFFICACY
One:
Pfizer claim of 95% efficacy was based on only a tiny number of COVID-19 cases in the clinical trials – 170 cases in over 40,000 trial participants. A measure of vaccine efficacy among such a small sample of COVID-19 cases is too insignificant to generalize 200s of millions of people in the population.
When, comparing the number of participants who showed antibody evidence of having contracted COVID-19 during the trial, only a 54% efficacy and protection is found.
Since vaccine recipients often, do not make viral antibodies, despite having contracted COVID-19, and even greater number of vaccine recipients who became infected during the trial, we’re not counted, and the actual efficacy was far less than 50% – yet the FDA is still issued and EUA.
Two:
Pfizer, clinical trial data, showing strong efficacy and safety conflict with Pfizer’s real-world data submitted to the FDA of the 32,760 injured vaccine recipients with known outcomes during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine rollout, Pfizer reported:
. Approximately 20% of the reports involve COVID-19
. COVID-19 was the third most recently reported adverse event
. Over 15% of the COVID-19 cases were graded as severe
. Over 200 people in this post marketing study died from COVID-19
SAFETY
Three:
Contrary to public statements by Pfizer and FDA, both were aware of data, showing that the vaccine ingredients travel from the injection site to the bloodstream, cross important blood – organ barriers, (including at the brain, testis, and ovaries) and continue to produce harmful spike proteins for an undetermined amount of time.
Four:
Pfizer did not expect more than 158,000 separate adverse events to be reported during the additional 12-week rollout and had to hire a small army of 12,400 additional, full-time staff to manage the caseload.
Despite visa additional staff, Pfizer cannot determine the outcome in over 20,000 people reporting vaccine injuries.
Five:
As Pfizer tracked adverse events during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine rollout, 270 pregnant women reported a vaccine injury, but Pfizer only followed 32 of them and 28 of their babies died. This is a shocking, 87.5% fetal death rate.
Six:
Pfizer, real world data, demonstrated a range of adverse side effects for breast-feeding mothers who received the vaccine, and for the nursing babies, including infantile, vomiting, fever, rash, agitation, and allergy to the vaccine; in addition, breast-feeding, mothers, experience, partial, paralysis, suppressed, lactation, breast, pain, migraines, and breast milk discoloration to a blue/green color
Ignoring this alarming data on vaccination during pregnancy and nursing, Pfizer, the federal health agencies, and numerous medical societies strongly recommended that pregnant and nursing women across the country receive the mRNA vaccines.
Seven:
Pfizer clinical trial documents suggest that it’s mRNA vaccine ingredient that instruct for spike protein can be transferred from one person to another by skin-to-skin contact, inhalation, and, bisexual intercourse to bodily fluids, causing an unvaccinated person to have an “environmental exposure” to the vaccine. In other words, shedding is a real concern expressed in Pfizer’s own documents. Yet as late as July 2022, the centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assured Americans the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine shedding is a “myth” and is “misinformation”.
Eight:
The Pfizer, studying inclusion criteria for men, regarding either total abstinence from sex with women of childbearing age, or the use of both condoms, and other “highly effective” contraception, and to refrain from donating sperm, suggested Pfizer suspected that vaccine vaccinated men’s ejaculate could affect both women and unborn children conceived during the trial and afterwards.
Nine:
Pfizer did not evaluate vaccine adverse effects on male fertility during clinical trials, because the company was in a rush, stating that the absence of reproductive toxicity data was necessary to speed its vaccine development to meet the allegedly urgent health need. Yet Pfizer trial documents, show that the company knew it’s Vaccine ingredients. (the lipid particles, carrying the mRNA) pass, the blood testicular barrier, and the previous studies had shown that nano particles accumulate in the testes and cause reproductive harm by adversely affecting sperm quality, quantity, morphology, and motility.
10:
During Pfizer study of vaccine adverse events during the public rollout in early 2021, Pfizer included” anti-sperm antibody positive” among its 1290 adverse events of special interest that were reported. The presence of anti-sperm antibodies in male ejaculate is an immune cause of male in fertility, as adhesion of antibodies to sperm affects their motility (movement.), making the sperm journey to the egg highly difficult or even impossible.
11:
Although mRNA naturally occurs in the body, it decrees quickly, Pfizer modified the vaccine RNA (modRNA) so that 1) it continues, making spike proteins for an untested, 2, it produces more numerous spike proteins in untested amount, and 3, the body’s normal immune reactions, which may suppress immunity to other diseases, such as viruses and cancer. Despite such significant modifications to the vaccine, mRNA, Pfizer did not perform the normal studies, measuring duration of the mRNA, or spike proteins, or the doses of spike proteins produce by.modRNA different individuals.
12:
During the vaccine rollout in early 2021 cases of myo-pericarditis (inflammation of the heart lining and muscle) were reported to Pfizer, and one month, before the EUA for teens was granted (May 2020), a peer reviewed. Study showed that 35 teenagers had suffered myocarditis after their Pfizer vaccines. In August 2021 after millions of teens had received the vaccine, FDA, CDC, and Pfizer issued the warning about myocarditis risk in teens.
13:
Pfizer did not disclose that it’s COVID-19 vaccine ingredients include micro RNA’s, which are an important natural component of gene expression and regulation, and are associated with many diseases as well as a person’s immunity. Micro RNAs coming from outside the body, such as in Pfizer vaccine after the delicate balance, among these naturally occurring molecules, with the potential for harmful health consequences that Pfizer has not studied.
14:
Pfizer phase 3 trial in humans were supposed to compare the vaccine group against the control group receiving placebo for two full years in order to measure the safety of the vaccine, but Pfizer eliminated most of the control group after four months by vaccinating those who had receive the placebo injection. This removes the vital opportunity for measuring whether the vaccines are causally connected with other poor health conditions that develop after vaccination.
15:
The Pfizer documents serious concern about the manufacturing standards for the vaccine: the FDA criticize the Kansas facility, packaging the mRNA vaccine ingredients in 2019 and 2024” mold, and bacteria, and drugs released without quality inspection,” and as of the latest inspection, Pfizer continues to recover bacterial and/or mold, isolates from critical zones, according to the FDA.
16:
In September 2021, Pfizer, and the FDA did a bait and switch by licensing a version of Pfizer vaccine, COMIRNATY, and although they claim that Pfizer emergency use (EUA)” interchangeable/equivalent” with Comirnaty, Pfizer documents, show that only approximately 4% of the EUA vaccine was interchangeable and was not available to the general public. Pfizer states, ”certain Pfizer, Biotech Covid19 vaccine authorized for emergency use comply with [Comirnaty]” -exactly 9 out of 190 total lots.
Pfizer’s favorable, clinical trial conclusions, contradict the real world, adverse effects and efficacy failures documented after the public rollout of Pfizer, Covid vaccine.
If Pfizer had a TV commercial for its Covid vaccine list, the 158,893 adverse events reported in the first 12 weeks, the announcer would be reading them for more than 80 consecutive hours.
Rowen note: 9 of the most feared words you can hear; Knock Knock, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”
The following thee groups have done analysis of Pfizer's raw data and their arguments I find are more to the point:
https://researchrebel.substack.com/p/comirnaty-or-comirnaughty
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/anomalous-patterns-of-mortality-and?
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202309.0131/v1
Definite signs of massive fraud. Trial does not appear to have been either randomized or blinded. And looks like they committed fraud with PCR testing in more than one way. Plus other things...
Aside from the methodological issue about the antibodies suggeting 54% efficacy (as an upper bound), the other issue I have is that severe covid rate is not best outcome IMO. You can't prevent covid. You can only delay it. Hence, the better questions would be "what is the proportion of covid cases in either group that turn out to be severe". The NEJM paper has enough data in plain sight to calculate roughly 50% efficacy by that measure. So (0.5)*(0.5) => 25% efficacy more like it, before accounting for any fraud.
The same exact thing happened with Moderna more recently. A court had to order the FDA to release the data. But I have not seen anyone do similar analyses for Moderna. I suspect all the real sleuths are just fatigued and have lives to get back to. Since the two trials look virtually idenitical in the NEJM papers, I am content to assume the trial was also fraudulent until proven otherwise.
I'm just starting to read the copied report but in one of the first paragraphs there are a lot of typos and extraneous comments that disguise the meaning; here's the original and my correction:
Since vaccine recipients often, do not make viral antibodies, despite having contracted COVID-19, and even greater number of vaccine recipients who became infected during the trial, we’re not counted, and the actual efficacy was far less than 50% – yet the FDA is still issued and EUA.
Since vaccine recipients often do not make viral antibodies despite having contracted COVID-19, an even greater number of vaccine recipients who became infected during the trial were not counted, and the actual efficacy was far less than 50% – yet the FDA is still issued and EUA.
I would like to point out also in the introduction the sentence "...Well, below I have transcribed the document word for word with regards to its summary..." it should be "with regard to", not "with regards to".
Sincerely,
The Grammar Police