Popular Blood Pressure Drug Found to INCREASE Stroke Risk over 23 Years. Now, Relate this to Vaccine "Science".
#58 2025 The Rowen Report
Dear Subscriber,
I have an interesting report for you today, with some medical philosophical questions especially for a chat buddy with whom some communication channels have recently opened.
A report just came out indicating that a popular blood pressure pill. Lisinopril, increases the risk of stroke death by 19% after 23 years! Wow, imagine, a study that followed total risks for decades, and over a Pharma pill.
Now you’d think that, since high blood pressure is a known risk for stroke, that a BP drug would lower stroke risk. But due to lisinopril’s mechanism of action, it actually raised stroke risk long term. Lisinopril can cause the body to accumulate potassium, which can lead to heart irregularity, which can lead to stroke. So, please read the trail again. One problem, leads to another, which can continue, until a major problem manifests. Long term readers of mine know I’ve been saying this about modern medicine synthetic petrochemical pharmaceutical treatments for my entire career. If you interfere with a body process, it can reflex out in ways we might not even see, understand, or even detect.
This lisinopril report is philosophically important. Please look at how many years it took to finally detect, understand and report.
So, let’s turn to childhood vaccines. If you do an AI search, you’ll discover that phase I studies last about a year. One vaccine, hepatitis, is found on the FDA website to have been followed for safety only a few days (DAYS, you read that right!)
6.1 Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a vaccine cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another vaccine and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In three clinical studies, 434 doses of RECOMBIVAX HB, 5 mcg, were administered to 147 healthy infants and children (up to 10 years of age) who were monitored for 5 days after each dose. [emphasis added by me] Injection site
reactions and systemic adverse reactions were reported following 0.2% and 10.4% of the injections, respectively. The most frequently reported systemic adverse reactions (>1% injections), in decreasing order of frequency, were irritability, fever (³101°F oral equivalent), diarrhea, fatigue/weakness, diminished appetite, and rhinitis.
I have been in interesting discussions with a mature brilliant woman who teaches law. Her insight on politics and law amazes me. While seemingly WOKE, she provides a seemingly balanced and wise perspective on political processes and personalities of the day. I enjoy listening and learning, though I am anything but WOKE.
But she is a devout believer in vaccination, and “trusts the science”. Hence, my two cents as an experienced physician in the trenches for almost 50 years means little to her medical analysis (she is a medical layman) of the science of vaccine safety and efficacy.
I will apply the lisinopril lesson to vaccination study.
So, just the hepatitis vaccine is admitted by FDA on its site to have been studied 1) for 5 days and 2) in children from infancy to 10 years. But we DON’T know the age distribution. 146 could have been 9.9 years old and one an infant!
Furthermore, a read of that package insert reveals that the hepatitis vax is loaded with aluminum. I do trust the science on aluminum. It is a harsh NEUROTOXIN. I don’t trust “science” studying a metal toxin by injection for only 5 days. It can take years for lead poisoning to manifest clinically. And we are permitting science of 5 days on aluminum to permit forced injecting the substance into millions of babies????? I’ve never seen a newborn visit a bordello or shoot up IV drugs (risks of getting hepatitis).
So here is what AI says about aluminum, and this material is condensed from CDC propaganda:
Safety of aluminum in vaccines:
Prevnar 20 (Pneumococcal 20-valent Conjugate Vaccine) contains
125 micrograms (µg) of aluminum per 0.5 mL dose. This aluminum is present in the form of aluminum phosphate, which serves as an adjuvant in the vaccine formulation.
The amount of aluminum in vaccines is considered safe, and its use as an adjuvant has a long history of safe use. [emphasis added by me]
The human body encounters much larger amounts of aluminum through daily intake of food and water compared to the small amount present in vaccines.
Now I did a little more on AI and it says that just one ounce of water in the lungs can drown a toddler. Hmmm. I think AI cannot think for itself. It just said that the vaccine contains far less aluminum than you get in your diet. That is a true statement. But the vaccine’s aluminum is by INJECTION!
AI said that just one ounce of water can drown a child. But AI will tell you that a toddler will typically down 32 ounces of water in a day!. So, a tiny amount of water inhaled compared to the much larger safe amount swallowed can kill a child. So why does AI, and more importantly, your science believing authorities, see no difference between aluminum ingested and aluminum INJECTED?
Again, turning to AI, we find that GI absorption of aluminum is 0.1-0.4%. And “THEY” have the audacity to “science you” with the fact that you are exposed to many times more aluminum in your diet than is contained in the vaccine.
My chat buddy trusts the science. So do I. But we have to APPLY the science to the situation. I don’t think she or those she follows is doing that.
Further, we know that children of today are getting far more chronic conditions than children of yesteryear. So, if we were to follow the kids getting MMR, hepatitis vaccine, and the 70 other vaccines for a few decades, like lisinopril, we would see that these recipients have an unusually high incidence of chronic illness. Now we could not specifically blame the vaccines for this, for correlation is not causation. But should that not stimulate a 20-year study on say 5000 kids vaccinated compared to 5000 not vaccinated.
Yes professor, lisinopril lowered blood pressure, what it set out to do. But it actually raised stroke mortality. The precious vaccines of the pro forced vaxxers “might” reduce communicable disease. I grant you that. But does that reduce overall mortality? Overall morbidity? Where is your science? When it comes to children, I want to see studies AT LEAST as lengthy and looking at end points as the lisinopril study, which came as a real shock to many.
I happen to know open minded pediatricians who did tally up the health of their patients that were not vaxxed and compared them to vaxxed children. The overall health was like night and day. But they could not publish their SCIENCE! Journals refused publication of this important science. The deck was stacked against them. Just like Galileo could not publish his science supporting the sun centered solar system. Instead, he was placed under house arrest to silence him. Nothing has changed regarding science.
So, what about aluminum by injection:
Now let’s return to the hepatitis vaccine:
All formulations contain approximately 0.5 mg of aluminum (provided as amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate, previously referred to as aluminum hydroxide) per mL of vaccine. In each formulation, hepatitis B surface antigen is adsorbed onto approximately 0.5 mg of aluminum (provided as amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate) per mL of vaccine. The vaccine contains <15 mcg/mL residual formaldehyde.
So, the FDA approved package insert of the RECOMBIVAX hepatitis vaccine admits to INJECTING 500 mcg (0,5 mg) of aluminum as aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate when out of the other side of the government’s science mouth it recommends a maximum limit of 4-5 mcg/kg/day to prevent toxicity. The average newborn weighs about 3.5 kg. That translates to about 14 mcg max recommended exposure, yet the RECOMBIVAX is delivering over THIRTY times that much. Again, trust the science, as my chat friend says she does, and thinks I should.
Well, even better than trusting science, I trust logic and common sense. My departed daddy stressed that above all else.
I don’t need science to prove gravity to me. I see it and feel it. Science can explain certain aspects of gravity, which I appreciate. But the parents of vaccine injured babies, and the poorly tabulated VAERS database (1-10% reported events) speak far more logic to me about vaccines than Pharma funded studies and panels headed by the likes of Paul Offit. I encourage all of. you, and my chat friend, to see this talk delivered by Sharyl Attkisson to an audience at Hillsdale College. She was fantastic at exposing Pharma corruption in the fashion of an investigative journalist of old! Today the journalists are spoon fed and then spoon feed you. I do fear my chat buddy has swallowed the spoon feeding as well. (She was a big proponent of the COVID vax and how the government handled it).
I again turn to logic. I put a bullet into a six shooter and force you to play Russian roulette; your chance of blowing your head off is just one in six. You’ll likely survive. But keep passing that gun around and someone is definitely going to blow his head off. Same with vaccines. Most kids will likely not get nailed by a single vaccine. But my chat buddy believes all kids should get the mandated vaccines to protect the immune compromised and those who cannot get vaccinated. Meaning: I have to play Russian roulette with MY children to protect yours.
No, I don’t believe law or the universe dictates following moronic mandates. I should NEVER be compelled to place my kids at risk for yours. You chose risk by bringing children into the world. That is life, and that is RISK. YOUR risk. Don’t put up my kids to protect yours as I don’t have a right to force Russian roulette on your children to protect mine. Take marriage for example. That is also risk. You vowed to take care of your spouse in sickness and in health. Does that mean you can compel your neighbor, or me, to look after your sick spouse? You have a responsibility to take care of your children. Does that mean you can compel me or my children to protect yours? Are we a society of forcing behavior for the “greater good” or are we a society that protect individual Rights? The former is Nazi and communist vs the latter - American protection of individual freedom. Is our American experiment dead for your “greater good?”
Further logic, which my chat buddy refuses to accept: If vaccines work as you claim they work based on “science”, then you giving your children the vaccines should put a bullet proof vest on your child and you should not need to risk mine. The very fact that you want to place my children at risk to protect your vaccinated children strongly suggests that your science (and logic) is flawed, and/or that you believe in the tyranny of former Senator (Doctor) Richard Pan, the tyrant who brought forced vaccination to California and forced hundreds of families to flee the state to place their kids in public school. Or, that you bought into the spoon feeding of Pharma and Big Government for their agenda.
Oh, incidentally, since my chat buddy teaches law, I raise another thought for her. In California, children have a CONSITUTIONALLY protected/mandated right to a free public education.
Per Article IX, Section 5 of the California Constitution: “The Legislature shall provide for a system of common schools by which a free school shall be kept up and supported in each district at least six months in every year, after the first year in which a school is established.”
Yet you believe in forced vaccination in order to attend school. Does this not create a monstrous conflict in law? Can a statute passed against overwhelming public opposition, by Pharma bought tyrants, void out a Constitutionally protected Right? I’d like your erudite legal answer on that, for I totally trust your legal “science” and take on Constitutional Rights. You are the expert there. I look forward to your response to this post, especially on this last point.
To the Excellent Health of All who read these pages, and I thank you for your support!
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
PS I have another observation for my chat buddy. LUr chatting began when you reached out to me to get my perspective and the perspective of others of my political bent because in your world you don’t know anyone who voted for Trump. That opened the door for some chat sharing, and to hopefully get perspective of the “other side” for both of us. But consider - in your world you knew no one who voted for Trump, yet he won, handily, so some people, likely the majority, voted for him.
Well, similarly, you seemingly don’t know anyone or any family where there has been a vaccine injury, though there definitely has been for at least 1% of them are in the VAERS vaccine database. (There is a “science report” that discloses that vaccine injuries are woefully under reported to VAERS). Just like there scientifically must be a plurality or majority of the population that voted for Trump, though you don’r know any in your cloistered world, is it not plausible that there really are a heck of a lot of injured children that are also not in your cloistered world?
Very good post. I agree 💯.
I read your post every day. I’ve been into ozone for 30 years.
Sorry if the link did not come through. Here's one: https://www.journee-mondiale.com/en/this-blood-pressure-pill-increases-stroke-death-risk-by-19-after-23-year-study/