Outstanding Video and [Retracted] Article on the Outstanding Benefits of Unvaxxed for Kids
#25 2024 The Rowen Report
Dear Subscriber,
My columns largely began in Facebook around 2013 and 2014 during the California SB 277 forced vaccine law debates. I was scathed by know-it-all trolls on FB, but the platform tolerated me. The bill passed. I wrote a few medical exemptions because Tyrant Senator Richard Pan assured us that our medical judgment was still king. That was short lived. I saw the writing on the wall early. Terri and I were forced to cease trying to save children from damage. A college (Ken Stoller) in San Francisco did not stop and continued writing exemptions based on a child’s genetic risk factors. The medical board ultimately took his license as a threat to the public. I ultimately left Facebook over its censorship of my posts on the COVID genetic jab and came here. I thank you all for coming over to Substack with me.
Over the years I heard about an Oregon pediatrician who bravely permitted unvaxxed children into his practice, and who did not “fire” families who refused to vaccinate their children. He had a very large population of children born into his practice. Hence, he truly had a “virgin” population of kids that he knew for sure were not vaccinated.
Like most docs, he thought that vaccines did good for children, until he had several normal children “coincidentally” become suddenly autistic clearly related to a vaccine. Then he started digging.
His digging led to a very significant medical paper being published (after MUCH difficulty finding a journal to publish it). Please click on the link. Read the abstract.
“…….Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) compared to 5.3% of the (partially and fully) vaccinated. The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling. Our results give agency to calls for research conducted by individuals who are independent of any funding sources related to the vaccine industry. While the low rates of developmental disorders prevented sufficiently powered hypothesis testing, it is notable that the overall rate of autism spectrum disorder (0.361%) in the cohort is one-fifth that of the US national rate (1.851%). The practice-wide rate of ADHD was roughly half of the national rate. The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.”
Then you will see in the watermark background that the journal retracted the article. Hmmm.
Dr. Paul Thomas went on to find that all sorts of chronic problems were far, far less in his unvaxxed children than the vaxxed. Asthma, eczema, anemia, ear infection, urticaria, and many other immune related disease processes were a fraction of those in the vaxxed. Findings like this deserve a Nobel Prize for the impact on humanity. His reward? Just 5 days after the peer review article appeared, the Oregon Medical Board emergently suspended his license alleging he was a severe danger to the public. Here is what the Epoch Times has to say:
“Dr. Paul Thomas is a retired pediatrician from Portland, Oregon. He was forced to give up his medical license by the Oregon Medical Board because he published data about what he was observing in his patients—that the unvaccinated children were getting less sick compared to the vaccinated.
When Dr. Thomas decided to take a moderate approach with vaccinating children in his practice, he became well known in the Portland community. His book, “The Vaccine-Friendly Plan,” offered an alternative vaccination schedule that focused on lowering the amount of aluminum a child was exposed to during vaccination. Aluminum is found in most pediatric vaccines and is a known neurotoxin.
“I was the only mainstream clinic that was allowing people to not vaccinate,” Dr. Thomas told Frontline Health at the Children’s Health Defence 2nd Annual Conference.
According to Dr. Thomas, when parents didn’t want their child to follow the CDC vaccination schedule, most of the pediatricians in Portland said, “Sorry, you can’t be here.”
Many of these parents turned to Dr. Thomas.
This opened a unique perspective into the lives of children that were vaccinated and those who were not. Dr. Thomas decided to do a study on 3,324 children in his practice. He looked at their medical records over a long period of time to see what the data might reveal about the health outcomes for his patients.
And he only looked at the children that were born into his practice. This made sure that he could be certain about every single procedure and ailment that the child had.
The results were shocking, but Dr. Thomas managed to publish them in a peer-reviewed journal. His vaccinated patients had much worse health outcomes when it came to allergies, ADHD, asthma, and infections.
Within five days of publication, Dr. Thomas received a letter from his lawyer saying that his medical license was suspended. He was labeled as a “threat” to public health and his paper was retracted.
Join us on Frontline Health as Dr. Thomas shares how his stance on vaccines evolved over time and why he now cautions against his “vaccine-friendly plan.”
I am writing this on the heels of my post on Albert Einstein, who addressed the stifling of dissent in science and at the political level. Many doctors are prosecuted by their boards for cutting off the wrong leg, using drugs/alcohol, and clearly being a danger to their patients thereby. Then there are those who are a “theoretical” risk to the community, unproven, because of the acceptance of unproven medical dogma by the Church of Modern Medicine. Like those in the 1400s got burned at the stake for their heresy against the Catholic church, these souls have their livelihoods and service to humanity burned at the stake. Imagine, ADD is a national crisis, and this doctor found and reported a zero incidence in his unvaxxed population. I’d bet that none of his unvaxxed went on to become mass murderers like the drugged out (“legal and promoted drugs”) young people have become. Scientific dissent is violently crushed. We have not learned from Einstein. Tesla, a humanitarian and a genius on par with Einstein (a reader here pointed that out to me, thank you), was also violently crushed, but not by government and peers, but by the Robber Barons. Humanity lost.
Many years go, I saw the cover of a national news magazine question if God is dead. I don’t think God is dead. I see God’s work in recoveries in those who have fled the orthodox medical nightmare, seeking healing in the remedies provided by the Creator. I saw God’s hand in rapid recoveries from Ebola. (And a major medical journal would not publish that event either - it involved ozone therapy). I think EVIL lives, and our sheeple have allowed it to penetrate most every aspect of our lives, from injecting toxins into innocent newborns to abject war. All is interconnected.
Alas, for the physicians who are burned at the stake, this is reminiscent of the old witch drownings. If the witch floated, she was guilty and would then be murdered. If she sunk, she drowned, but ah well, at least she was not a witch. Do you see much difference in handling of the witch “doctors” of today? We are first drowned, then later found to be correct, and in the case of Ignaz Semmelweis, hailed as a hero AFTER the horrible cruelty of the hazings.
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
I would like to see a study that looks at vax and unvax and health conditions but also considers other variables to see if there is any impact such as dietary factors and stay at home parenting. For instance parents who do not vaccinate, are they also more informed about healthy eating choices for their children? With one parent a stay-at-home parent, does this also affect children with fewer illness (not at daycare) and dietary choices (more time to prepare healthy meals).
Thank you so much for all your research and writing. There are many of us that truly appreciate all that you do. Do you have any reference articles you could share on ozone dosing. For ear, nasal, drinking, etc.? I would love specific protocols for certain things/conditions. Just to receive the maximum benefit while safely applying this amazing modality.