Dear Subscriber,
This weekend we had our regular ozone training workshop and I’m happy to report it was most well received. I’ll be posting some videos of participants on YouTube soon. Terri did an outstanding job in teaching some outstanding techniques we developed over the years.
One of the doctors watching kinesiology evaluations kindly provided me this published reference regarding the method.
This study investigated differences in values of manual muscle tests after exposure to congruent and incongruent semantic stimuli. Muscle testing with a computerized dynamometer was performed on the deltoid muscle group of 89 healthy college students after repetitions of congruent (true) and incongruent (false) self-referential statements. The order in which statements were repeated was controlled by a counterbalanced design. The combined data showed that approximately 17% more total force over a 59% longer period of time could be endured when subjects repeated semantically congruent statements (p < .001). Order effects were not significant. Over-all, significant differences were found in muscle-test responses between congruent and incongruent semantic stimuli.
Kinesiology involves using a test muscle and then putting the body to an energetic challenge to detect subtle disturbances, or corrective methods. I openly acknowledge that it is subjective, though for years, I have used it as a guide to assist in determining causes and remedies. A few have insisted that I must be pressing harder when their body was challenged. I could only insist that indeed their muscle weakened and that I was not pushing harder. It is important that the operator remove his consciousness from the testing.
Now I have some objective material that kinesiology is, in fact, at least partially objective. A dynamometer is certainly an objective test as it is a hard measurement with a strain gauge and is reproduceable:
I hope you find this helpful. Needless to say, the technique is only as good as the operator doing it. Years ago, I did a most uncomfortable but highly effective injection therapy for reconstructing tendons, ligaments, etc. Called prolotherapy. It involved dozens of injections at multiple sites to rebuild tissues. I was trained by the best – the late William Faber, DO. In return, I taught him ozone.
His technique was to pepper the affected area in a shotgun type blast of injections. It was highly effective, but highly uncomfortable, and took a huge toll on me due to the number of injections. (My spirit was attached to every needle penetration, draining me). Amazingly, I found that I could determine the exact level or location to inject using kinesiology, and was able to eliminate up to 80% of the injections to get an even better result. This method has been carried forward into prolo-ozone therapy to help us get the perfect location for injection. Your body tells us. With prolo-ozone or commonly called prolozone, there are only a few injection sites, and the results seem to be even much better than prolotherapy.
Kinesiology can be used to determine supplements and remedies that might be useful in prevention and assistance with health challenges. I believe use of kinesiology (for supplement suggestions) with ozone therapy is one reason our results with Lyme disease are at least 85%. And – NO antibiotics! And, if you have watched our dental playlist on YouTube, you will see where kinesiology has helped us witness the unbelievable.
We keep a listing of physicians trained by either Terri or me or both on our office website. All have been introduced into the kinesiology technique, but I cannot say if they are actually making use of it currently.
Oh, on another note, the doctors were instructed in EBOO/ozone dialysis. Many were shocked at the system we developed, which is far less expensive for the doctor and patient alike, but far superior to limited usefulness proprietary systems costing more than double the methods Terri and I developed together. This saves you a bundle in office fees.
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
Followed the citation tree and it led to this from 2016:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5131520/
Muscle testing allegedly discerned truths from lies, at least in this experiment.
Love this subject. This is hard to believe but it does work. Many, many years back, a brilliant man taught me (and others in a private class) how to 'muscle test' our own bodies. On your right hand put the top of your index finger to the top of the thumb next to it. And press/hold the two finger tips tightly together. Then with the left hand put the index finger and the thumb through the WHOLE 'hole' of the two right finger tips tightly pressed together. And ask your body a question. If the two fingers (index and thumb) of the left hand cannot spread and open up the hole (of the two closed finger tips on the right hand) the hole remains firmly together as a WHOLE hole, then you will get your answer. Likewise, If the WHOLE hole spreads/splits and opens up you will get your answer. The body will tell you the truth. It's a form of muscle testing, using the 'muscles' of the index finger and thumb on both the right and left hand. And you can do it with other people asking their body a question. Question your body with this 'muscle' test and it does work. You might not always want the answer, but the body never lies, symptoms never lie. Best, regards Dr. Ros.