Dear Subscriber,
First, I have gotten so much positive feedback on my last post on low dose cortisol that I decided to start a detailed report for the Premium section on this wonderful approach to using this adrenal hormone. You can expect it soon. My goal in the Premium section is to give you far more actual tangible value to your self/family from the information I provide than the very modest cost of the subscription. I do believe it is more than worth it (or I wouldn’t be writing), and I thank all of you for your Premium section subscriptions, and of course, especially the Founding subscribers for their great generosity. I am grateful for for all of you here in the free section, and humbly ask that you let your friends know about this Substack. The paid subscriptions are of great importance to us considering my recent travails. So, now on to the meat of this post
__________________________________________________________________________
From what I am reading, a combination of factors may lessen the need for world elites to lower the population by murder (vaccination, Pharma drugs, etc.) I’ve reported to you the growing impact of chemical pollution in the environment, which chemicals act as hormone disruptors. Consider, we have an epidemic of ED, of prostate issues, of breast cancer, transgender and more matters that can clearly be linked to toxins poisoning our endocrine system. We know that sperm counts in men have plummeted by about half in recent years from what they were 50 years ago. Of ever greater concern, the plunge is accelerating:
Their findings confirm that sperm counts are falling by around 1.1% per year, with an overall decline of 51.6% in 45 years. Of concern, the rate of decline has doubled since 2000. And we genuinely don't know why.
Now I think that the acceleration is due to the additive effect of all the toxicants in the environment. But in this report that just came out, we have information that most would not have suspected. Young otherwise healthy males in Switzerland were found to have a drop in sperm count connected to mobile phone use. This is just another hit to our ability to reproduce. And, as I said, perhaps the world’s elites hell bent on killing off half the population will find that a huge population reduction is already in progress and outright murder (including by vaccines) will not be necessary.
I’ve been concerned about mobile phones for years. Yes, I have one, but I don’t keep in on my body except when traveling. I know people, including family, who have chosen to rely on mobile phones to even replace land lines – a big mistake in my opinion. Mobile phones emit microwave radiation. These carry much more disruptive energy than radio waves. Most men will have their phone in their pocket or on a belt holster – close to testicles.
So here is another thought. We know that both ovaries and testicles are organs very sensitive to toxins. But sensitivity is relative. If cell phone use, or wearing it, can reduce semen quality it has to be reducing function of other organs as well, perhaps not to a level we can easily see/measure. And toxic effects can take years to manifest. Our children are sporting mobile phones. Like the COVID genetic jab (mandated), cell phone use is also an experiment on untested technology, but its use is voluntary (unlike the genetic jab).
But please also consider this. Most men over 50 don’t care so much about sperm count. We are well past making babies. However, most men I know still want sexual functioning. If semen quality can drop, so might erection quality. Both are dependent on same cellular processes.
I strongly suggest keeping your land line. Keep the mobile phone as far away from you as possible. Have it connected to WiFi whenever possible, which uses a much less energy emission.
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0015028223018757
“””Association between self-reported mobile phone use and the semen quality of young men
Fertility and Sterility, Available online 14 October 2023, Pages
Kevin Y. Chu, Francis Petrella, Joginder Bidhan
Objectives
To investigate the association between mobile phone exposure and semen parameters.
Design
A nationwide cross-sectional study.
Setting
Andrology laboratories in close proximity to 6 army recruitment centers.
Patients
In total, 2886 men from the general Swiss population, 18–22 years old, were recruited between 2005 and 2018 during military conscription.
Intervention
Participants delivered a semen sample and completed a questionnaire on health and lifestyle, including the number of hours they spent using their mobile phones and where they placed them when not in use.
Main Outcome Measures
Using logistic and multiple linear regression models, adjusted odds ratios and β coefficients were determined, respectively. The association between mobile phone exposure and semen parameters such as volume, sperm concentration, total sperm count (TSC), motility, and morphology was then evaluated.
Results
A total of 2759 men answered the question concerning their mobile phone use, and 2764 gave details on the position of their mobile phone when not in use. In the adjusted linear model, a higher frequency of mobile phone use (>20 times per day) was associated with a lower sperm concentration (adjusted β: −0.152; 95% confidence interval: −0.316; 0.011) and a lower TSC (adjusted β: −0.271; 95% confidence interval: −0.515; −0.027). In the adjusted logistic regression model, this translates to a 30% and 21% increased risk for sperm concentration and TSC to be below the World Health Organization reference values for fertile men, respectively. This inverse association was found to be more pronounced in the first study period (2005–2007) and gradually decreased with time (2008–2011 and 2012–2018). No consistent associations were observed between mobile phone use and sperm motility or sperm morphology. Keeping a mobile phone in the pants pocket was not found to be associated with lower semen parameters.
Conclusion
This large population-based study suggests that higher mobile phone use is associated with lower sperm concentration and TSC. The observed time trend of decreasing association is in line with the transition to new technologies and the corresponding decrease in mobile phone output power. Prospective studies with improved exposure assessment are needed to confirm whether the observed associations are causal.
Key Words
Electromagnetic radiation (EMR)
mobile phone position
mobile phone use
semen quality
sperm concentration
total sperm count (TSC)
“Experimental studies in rats have suggested that RF-EMF can affect the germ cell cycle, increase sperm death, and cause histological changes in the testes (20, 21, 22, 23). RF-EMF exposure has been linked also to a significant increase in abnormal histological changes in seminiferous tubules, suggesting an impairment of male fertility in mice (24). However, these effects are not always reproduced, mainly because of protocol differences, despite the numerous animal studies conducted since the 1970s (25). In addition, there are fundamental differences between spermatogenesis in humans and rodents (8). Experimental studies on human sperm in vitro, comparing RF-EMF-exposed with unexposed samples, mostly reported a significant increase in DNA fragmentation and reduced motility (22, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30). However, exposure set-ups in these studies were mostly insufficiently characterized and are unlikely to be comparable to in vivo exposure from typical mobile phone use because they were short-term exposures occurring directly on semen after ejaculation (31). In addition, bias related to exposure-induced temperature increase is another plausible explanation for the observed effects (32).”
I read about the potential danger of cellphone radiation to the gonads about 7 years ago. I was late in getting a cell phone--I first got a feature phone around 2007, and then an iPhone 6 around the start of 2015, and an iPhone 12 pro a few years ago. I also only have it on my body when I go out, which is less frequent lately. And I have a landline which I use at home most of the time. I always try to use the landline cordless handset and iPhone on speaker. For a while I did use Wi-Fi for my iPhone in the home, but I found for some reason it was interfering with my Wi-Fi antenna tuner that I use to record over-the-air TV broadcasts to my computer, so I've kept it on the cellular instead of Wi-Fi for that reason. My iPhone is usually a few feet away from me in the living room and I don't bring into the bedroom when I'm sleeping. When I am out I do keep my iPhone in my front pants pocket, but when I was reading about the radiation years ago, it mentioned that more radiation comes out of the back of a smartphone than the front of the glass covered screen, so I always put it in my pocket with the screen facing my leg. My iPhone also has a ballistic glass screen protector on it--I don't know if that helps further block any radiation.