Dear Subscriber,
Terri and I just returned from a major international conference on ozone in Santa Barbara. I spoke on EBOO/ozone dialysis which is extracorporeal blood ozonation/oxygenation. It is likely the best form of ozone delivery, but the most expensive and. I believe 10 pass is more cost effective, but we have many patients who prefer EBOO. It is a gentler form of ozone delivery to blood. If you are shopping for EBOO, please be aware of luring advertising which may claim good effects not directly related to EBOO, but to ancillary therapies given with EBOO. For example, I presented that I’ve seen advertising that EBOO filters the blood of heavy metals. However, those patients also received various forms of chelation therapy, so the lowering of metals cannot be attributed to EBOO. Furthermore, any form of ozone will encourage your body to make more glutathione, your principal detoxifier, which, on its own, removes heavy metals. So, it might not have to be expensive EBOO which lowers your metal burden, but any ozone.
I will be elaborating more on ozone in coming weeks, as well as cover some presentations made at the conference.
Today I want to draw your attention to more Fraud and Deception Administration’s attempt to funnel you into a 100% Pharma paradigm. Alliance for Natural Health is calling for political support/messages regarding FDA’s attempts to wipe out a nutritional supplement that can help promote NAD+ levels in your body. This time their attack is on NMN, a supplement I have taken.
A study has shown that NAD+ is important for more and higher quality eggs in mammalian ovaries. Supplements that support NAD+ are safe and might be useful for protecting human eggs in today’s toxic world. We know that sperm counts are plummeting in men. Likewise, ovarian egg quality and numbers are in peril.
Please visit this link and take action to protect your right to this supplement. Why does FDA want to ban this as an over-the-counter supplement? Because some Pharma Company wants all the action.
To your Excellent Health!
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
So I just watched a video about the 55 billion dollar supplement industry and found a sickening fact about a lack of any oversight on the quality and safety of supplements. Independent research on what is contained in thousands of supplements, in a meta analysis study shows astounding results with the majority of tested supplements having major problems ranging from bacterial and fungal contamination, measurable amounts of heavy metals or other dangerous chemicals, or the products containing absolutely none of the ingredient for which you purchased ( or a wrong or variable dose. Some contained illegal “doping” substances. Without ANY regulations, the incredibly wealthy supplement industry is behaving similarly to the pharmaceutical industry. Our FDA doesn’t have enough funding to go after the offenders and there are clauses in the laws to protect the supplement industry even when they’ve been found to have terrible health and safety issues (I can show you the legislation). I’m REALLY concerned since I rely on quite a few supps to support my particular issues. So....I’m not sure we are seeing the whole picture when a supplement is being pulled off the market or a supplement company is being “harassed” by the government. It’s confusing.
Congress should step up and put a stop to the practice of The FDA banning safe and relatively inexpensive nutritional supplements so that a drug company can spend millions of dollars trying to patent them, or even if they don't patent them, have exclusive rights because they spend millions of dollars on clinical trials. Here is the sad history of one such supplement, pyridoxamine, that was removed from the market by the FDA in 2009 after a petition from a startup drug company filed in 2005 that had been doing research on it as a drug. Through a long torturous process of sale of rights, drug trials, lack of funds, bankruptcy, failure to find buyers, merger with the debtor research trial organization, for the reorganization, and finally a petition and 2017 to the FDA to return the nutrient to a nutritional supplement status, so they could sell it as such. This is their petition with a history of the nutrient, as of 2017. I don't know the outcome of the petition or the FDA's action on it. But it's an example of a beneficial nutrient that was removed from the market about 14 years now, with ultimately no drug development and the loss of millions of dollars to some people, and it appears to still be in limbo. (Fortunately there's a similar compound, pyridoxal 5'-phosphate, that works in a similar way, or maybe even better, that is still on the market.)
https://www.fdanews.com/ext/resources/files/2017/10/10-25-17-Petition.pdf?1519657676