Famed Vaccine Rights Researcher Stephanie Seneff and Colleague Publish "Unintended Consequences" of the Vaccine. Great Paper.
#87 The Rowen Report
Dear Subscriber,
Famed vaccine rights researcher, Stephanie Seneff, and Greg Nigh (naturopathic oncology) teamed up to do an outstanding article on the vaccine possibly being worse than the disease. The article is entitled:
Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19
Link at bottom.
The pair lay out some serious thoughts about possible consequences of the vaccine to which the pundits have shown essentially no interest in ferreting out.
There are serious problems with the vaccine. And clearly there have been thousands of deaths from the vaccine. We are learning that the highly spike protein can remain in the body for months after vaccination., The vaccine induces far greater spike protein than wild infection. It carries a real risk of inducing prion disease (mad cow disease). It can induce toxic products to accumultate in the liver and spleen (largest lymph gland/organ in the body). These have abundant connections to the vagus nerve and toxins can be carried retrograde up the nerve into the brain. This little known vagus nerve activity is now believed to be one of the causes of Parkinsons. There is clear threat to sperm health. The spike protein is known to disrupt the blood brain barrier. It can induce thrombosis and damage endothelial cells, a threat to all organs. It appears to also raise the risk of autoimmunity.
There is a lot of. talk about risk reduction. There is a huge difference between “relative risk reduction” and “absolute risk reduction.” For these vaccines: “Moderna vaccine at the time of interim analysis demonstrated an absolute risk reduction of 1.1% (p= 0.004), while the Pfizer vaccine absolute risk reduction was 0.7% (p<0.000) (Brown 2021).” [I will put that into more understandable terminology for you. Say you need to genetically jab 1 million and you reduce the consequences of the disease from 2 (placebo) to zero(vaccine). Pharma would jump up and down telling you there is a 100% risk reduction and this is what the controlled press would spew out. Meanwhile the absolute (real) risk reduction is tiny, tiny.]
They conclude with the following recommendations, to which I have previously written about and heartily concur:
· A national effort to collect detailed data on adverse events associated with the mRNA vaccines with abundant funding allocation tracked well beyond the first couple of weeks
after vaccination.· Repeated autoantibody testing of the vaccine-recipient population. The autoantibodies tested could be standardized and based upon previously documented antibodies and autoantibodies potentially elicited by the spike protein.
· Immunological profiling related to cytokine balance and related biological effects. Tests should include, at a minimum, IL-6, INF-α, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein.
· Studies comparing populations who were vaccinated with the mRNA vaccines and those who did not confirm the expected decreased infection rate and milder symptoms of the vaccinated group, while at the same time comparing the rates of various autoimmune diseases and prion diseases in the same two populations.
· Studies to assess whether an unvaccinated person can acquire vaccine-specific forms of the spike proteins from a vaccinated person nearby.
· In vitro studies to assess whether the mRNA nanoparticles can be taken up by sperm and converted into cDNA plasmids.
· Animal studies to determine whether vaccination shortly before conception can result in offspring carrying spike-protein-encoding plasmids in their tissues, possibly integrated into their genome.
· In vitro studies aimed to better understand the toxicity of the spike protein to the brain, heart, testes, etc.
Considering the billions/trillions that the government has spent on the virus, I feel it was gross negligence that there was not a sound tracking system in place (other than notoriously underreported VAERS) to monitor for long term adverse effects of the vaccines.
I want to remind my readers that, in my opinion, we have been bamboozled by industry and FDA. FDA has approved one vaccine, which is NOT available. The others, which are being demanded by government, businesses, etc. are all still being distributed under emergency use authorization, meaning that ALL available vaccines are experimental at this point and the entire world population is being subjected to a medical experiment on a scale that could NEVER have been done save for media/corporate/government hegemony. What was the point of approving one vaccine, and which is NOT available? Comments welcome.
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51
I just posted your WONDERFUL article on Stephanie Seneff's mewe.com page. .... Huge worries are the immunological profiles, as well as personal fears as to the consequences of being around people who have gotten all three jabs. .... My hope is that doctors, in the manner of Dr. Hoffe, are assiduously conducting d-dimer tests on their patients. My worry is that they are not.....
You mention there is only one vaccine that has been approved. What vaccine is that? Why does everyone say the vaccines are approved if they are not?
Thank you,
Joanna