Eugenics. Another Dot to Connect from the Time of the Nazis to the Present in Transsexuals?
#48 2023 The Rowen Report
Dear Subscriber,
I just heard a most interesting take on Eugenics that is quite relevant to the controversy over gender affirming care.
Two definitions of Eugenics:
the study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. Developed largely by Sir Francis Galton as a method of improving the human race, eugenics was increasingly discredited as unscientific and racially biased during the 20th century, especially after the adoption of its doctrines by the Nazis in order to justify their treatment of Jews, disabled people, and other minority groups.
Eugenics is the scientifically erroneous and immoral theory of “racial improvement” and “planned breeding,” which gained popularity during the early 20th century. Eugenicists worldwide believed that they could perfect human beings and eliminate so-called social ills through genetics and heredity.
Conversely, it is also the study to decrease reproduction within a human population of “undesirables”. That was the MOA of the Nazis, which evil moved to exterminate Jews, Gypsies, gays, lesbians, transsexuals and more in a drive for a pureblood Aryan race.
In case you didn’t know it, the first target of the Nazis were not the Jews but what we now call the LGBTQ+ communities of Germany. The Nazis would not want such “undesirable” characteristics in their blood. They went further, to encourage young German women to get impregnated by athletic stars and physical elite. (Please see the movie RACE, a documentary on Jesse Owens, available on Netflix).
So, let’s fast forward to today. We now have “gender affirming care” available for transsexuals. You know, altering their body forever with surgery, hormones, etc. Of course in a trans woman, the biological testicles will be lopped off, forever rendering that young human infertile. If a trans man, the biological female organs will be lopped out along with “his” breasts.
The target of “gender affirming care” is the youth, even before they can get locked into what they really are (80% will naturally adjust to their biological sex absent forced intervention).
Now Eugenics does not have to end with the death of a human. The underlying goal is to prevent reproduction. In the case of the greatest evil doers of all time (the Nazis), the expedient way to accomplish their end was murder, so as to permanently prevent reproduction. They did experiment with frying the testicles of their prisoner men with radiation and other means to prevent reproduction.
Please know that the end result of the barbaric surgery of “gender affirming care”, promoted by the mainstream media and Progressive elitist do-gooders, is sterilization.
I am not going to take credit for connecting this dot, as I heard the thought on a broadcast, but I do think that the concept should be considered.
Now, from the NY Post:
The number of Brown University students identifying as LGBTQ+ has doubled since 2010, according to a new poll from the university’s student paper.
About 38% of students at the Ivy League school identified as either homosexual, bisexual, queer, asexual, pansexual, questioning, or other — more than five times the national rate for adults not identifying as straight.
Folks nearly ¼ of university students identifying with gender dysphoria, doubling in 10 years, is truly frightening. And imagine if these individuals get taken in by the push for “affirming care” and permanent sterilization. What a convenient way for the Eugenicists to get plow ahead in the modern world. Just as Nazi ideology survived through its Pharma spin offs of IG Farben, methinks that their drive of genetic purification did not end with their defeat. (That was clearly evident in America decades ago with sterilization of the “mentally incompetent”, minorities, and other undesirables.)
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
PS I have presented my ideas here on the rise of gender dysphoria in biological males. I believe it is our pollution of the environment with hormone disrupting chemicals (which act as estrogens). That does not explain, however, the magnitude of biological females identifying as males. The chemicals do not produce androgen effects. A friend’s theory is the introduction of hepatitis vaccines to children about 20 years ago. She said these vaccines were/are made with a line of cells from aborted male fetuses. In a newborn, I don’t think it would take too much abnormal hormonal influence to the “wiring”. (Even less in the fetus). Temporally, it correlates. It would take a number of years to manifest, about the time of the explosion of trans male some 10 years ago. I don’t know how to prove it out. If any of you have thoughts, please make comment. Thank you.
Might consider a book by William Walsh called Nutrient Power. Discusses impact of individual. nutrients on psychology
Just wow!
Thank you.