Damning Article on COVID Genetic Jab Retracted by Journal over Authors' Objections

#100 2024 The Rowen Report

Dear Subscriber,

Below is a rather damning article on a very high association of deaths port mRNA genetic jab and deaths. The authors found an astounding 73.9% of deaths after “vaccination” as likely direectly due to the jab.

If you are thinking about further COVID genetic alterations, please think again. The causes of death certainly fell into what we know about the circulation and clotting problems related to spike protein.

However, it appears that the article rubbed some powerful people the wrong way. After undergoing peer review and accepted, it was withdrawn by high ups on the journal.

I went to look for it on Pubmed and got this:

Withdrawn: A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination.

Hulscher N, et al. Forensic Sci Int. 2024. PMID: 39120477

Retraction of Publication

Forensic Sci Int

·        

. 2024 Jun 21:112115.

doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112115. Online ahead of print.

Withdrawn: A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination

Nicolas Hulscher ¹, Paul E Alexander ², Richard Amerling ², Heather Gessling ², Roger Hodkinson ², William Makis ³, Harvey A Risch ⁴, Mark Trozzi ⁵, Peter A McCullough ⁶

Affiliations expand

·       PMID: 39120477

·       DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112115

Free article

Abstract

This Article-in-Press has been withdrawn at the request of the Editors-in-Chief. Members of the scientific community raised concerns about this Article-in-Press following its posting online. The concerns encompassed. • Inappropriate citation of references. • Inappropriate design of methodology. • Errors, misrepresentation, and lack of factual support for the conclusions. • Failure to recognise and cite disconfirming evidence. The concerns were shared with the authors, who prepared a response and submitted a revised manuscript for consideration by the journal. In consideration of the extent of the concerns raised and the responses from the authors, the journal sent the revised manuscript to two independent peer-reviewers. The peer-reviewers concluded that the revised manuscript did not sufficiently address the concerns raised by the community and that it was not suitable for publication in the journal. The authors disagree with this withdrawal and dispute the grounds for it. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

So, we see censorship all over the place regarding materials that don’t follow the party line, or threaten the establishment. My own work was a victim of this in 2016 when a major journal rejected my article on ozone curing Ebola stating the editors did not think it was suitable for thejournal’s general practiciouner base. However, a few months later, it published on a VACCINE for Ebola. Forget we could cure the deadliest infection in the world. Our readers won’t be interested. But they will be more interested in a vaccine they won’t need in Britain.

We did get it published in the African Journal of Infectious Diseases – not Pubmed indexed, unfortunately.

If it was 1491, all articles on the flat earth would be accepted for publication. Those submitting articles suggesting the earth is round would be rounded up.

To Your Excellent Health!  (Which I don’t think includes further mRNA genetic alteration).

Robert Jay Rowen, MD

A Systematic REVIEW of Autopsy findings in deaths after covid-19 vaccination

Author links open overlay panelNicolas Hulscher ^a, Paul E. Alexander ^b, Richard Amerling ^b, Heather Gessling ^b, Roger Hodkinson ^b, William Makis ^c, Harvey A. Risch ^d, Mark Trozzi ^e, Peter A. McCullough ^b f 1

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.112115Get rights and content

We found that 73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.

• •

Our data suggest a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccination and death.

• •

These findings indicate the urgent need to elucidate the pathophysiologic mechanisms of death with the goal of risk stratification and avoidance of death for the large numbers of individuals who have taken or will receive one or more COVID-19 vaccines in the future.

• •

This review helps provide the medical and forensic community a better understanding of COVID-19 vaccine fatal adverse events.

Abstract

Background

The rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, Spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction, and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed and ScienceDirect for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18^th, 2023. All autopsy and necropsy studies that included COVID-19 vaccination as an antecedent exposure were included. Because the state of knowledge has advanced since the time of the original publications, three physicians independently reviewed each case and adjudicated whether or not COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.

Results

We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. The mean age of death was 70.4 years. The most implicated organ system among cases was the cardiovascular (49%), followed by hematological (17%), respiratory (11%), and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination, of which the primary causes of death include sudden cardiac death (35%), pulmonary embolism (12.5%), myocardial infarction (12%), VITT (7.9%), myocarditis (7.1%), multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%), and cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%).

Conclusions

The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine mechanisms of injury and death, coupled with autopsy confirmation by physician adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.

Keywords

Autopsy; 

necropsy; 

COVID-19; 

COVID-19 vaccines; 

mRNA; 

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; 

death; 

excess mortality; 

spike protein; 

organ system

Hulscher, Nicolas and Alexander, Paul E. and Amerling, Richard and Gessling, Heather and Hodkinson, Roger and Makis, William and Risch, Harvey A. and Trozzi, Mark and McCullough, Peter A., A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths after COVID-19 Vaccination. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4496137 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4496137