Dear Subscriber,
Journal articles, published and waiting to be published, are reporting some concerning data about the vaccine program that government and public health authorities should have told us. I am copying and pasting some sections that are quite relevant to all of us. The link to the article are provided. Here are two:
At a parliament enquiry by US senator Ron Johnson lawyer Thomas Renz presented three US military doctors, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long, whose declarations he planned to use in federal court under penalty of perjury. These doctors revealed a 300% increase in miscarriages in the military above the five-year average in 2021 with the five-year average being 1,499 miscarriages per year while in the first 10 months of 2021 the registered miscarriages were 4,182. Other diseases went up in a similar fashion such as an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). Neurological issues increased by 1000% from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021. Some other increased conditions were:
• 269% increase of myocardial infarction
• 291% increase of Bell’s palsy
• 156% increase of children’s congenital malformations of military personnel
• 471% increase of female infertility
• 467% increase of pulmonary embolisms
https://newlifenarrabri.wordpress.com/2022/02/01/jo-nova-huge- spike-in-us-military-injuries-from-covid-vaccinations/ and https:// www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/2/sen-johnson-to-secretary- austin-has-dod-seen-an-increase-in-medical-diagnoses-among- military-personnel
According to an interview in February 2022 with Julian Gillespie, who is currently fighting in court against the vaccine mandates, an evaluation of the TGA reports revealed that Australia’s average of adverse events after vaccination since 1971 up to 2020 is recorded as 2.4 death per year and up to 3,500 adverse events per annum. Since the rollout of the COVID vaccines there have been 755 deaths and 105,000 adverse events in a year with these figures likely to be underreported. https://rumble.com/vtv5pe-julian- gillespie-update-on-avn-judicial-review-to-stop-vaccines-in- australi.html?fbclid=IwAR34RTAAYX_nf9eTe1LOJSxuZ0-TbU FasXPQ37qhPEqrQI9wNe8Yig4ZwQ8
The question is how many deaths and side effects are we accepting as normal for vaccines and where do we draw the line to say more investigations need to be done before any further vaccines are distributed?
Never in Vaccine history have 57 leading scientists and policy experts released a report questioning the safety and efficacy of a vaccine [93]. They not only questioned the safety of the current Covid-19 injections, but were calling for an immediate end to all vaccination. Many doctors and scientists around the world have voiced similar misgivings and warned of consequences due to long-term side effects. Yet there is no discussion or even mention of studies that do not follow the narrative on safety and efficacy of Covid-19 vaccination.
In the USA, as Blaylock [94] states it very nicely, federal bureaucrats have forced the acceptance of special forms of care and prevention, which includes experimental mRNA vaccines [93]. Medical experts that have questioned the safety of these vaccines have been attacked and demonised, called conspiracy theorists and have been threatened to be de-registered if they go against the narrative. Alternative treatments were prohibited and people who never practised medicine are telling experienced doctors how to do their job. AHPRA is doing the same here in Australia to the detriment and in ignorance of science. When Adjunct Professor John Skerritt, who is currently the Deputy Secretary and directly responsibility for both the Therapeutic Goods Administration and the Office of Drug Control, was asked why the registration process for vaccines was shortened he wrote: “It is nonsense to assert that vaccines typically take 10 years to licence. The standard regulatory process for vaccines is about 10-12 calendar months and in the case of COVID-19 vaccines this period was shortened by accepting data on a rolling basis, teams reviewing different parts of the dossier in parallel, working collaboratively with international regulators, and by many members of the teams working long hours” (personal e-mail communication). One has to wonder how they propose to assess long-term side effects. Can we really trust any pharmaceutical drug approval by the TGA after this statement?
Pfizer never planned to reveal its clinical trial data and had to be ordered by a judge in the USA to release the data to the public. Even then they and the CDC tried to limit the number of pages published per month which would have made the full study data public knowledge sometime in the 2070ies. The reason given was that some proprietary information had to be blacked out before release to the public. Again, it is inconceivable why it would be impossible to go through the study data in a few months, when it took the CDC less than 4 weeks to give the injections emergency use authorization - unless you want to entertain the idea that the study data were never actually read and scrutinised, a frightening perspective.
As scientists we put up hypotheses and test them using experiments. If a hypothesis is proven to be true according to current knowledge it might still change over time when new evidence comes to light. Hence, sharing and accumulating knowledge is the most important part of science. The question arises when and why this process of science has been changed. No discussion of new knowledge disputing the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines is allowed. Who gave bureaucrats the means to destroy the fundaments of science and tell scientists not to argue the science?
https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/covid19-vaccinesan-australian-review.pdf
In this second article, the author uses survey and mathematics to estimate deaths from the vaccine. Yes, I agree that there is a lot of subjectivity in his methods, and I am not a math expert to analyze his means. Please read and I’ll comment afterwards.
Jan 24, 2023
Assuming the experiences captured in the survey represent the true ratio, the survey ratio is used to estimate nationwide COVID-19 vaccine fatalities: Estimated fatalities are 289,789 (95% CI 229,319–344,319). Estimated nationwide deaths combined with other survey data on adverse events are also used to estimate total adverse events. “Severe” adverse events are estimated to be about one million nationwide, and “less severe” adverse events are about 2.1 million. Estimated nationwide fatalities, “severe” injuries and “less severe” injuries tally to 3.4 million.
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-023-07998-3
As of Dec. 23, the CDC reported that over two years it had received 18,007 preliminary reports through VAERS, a user-generated reporting system, of people dying after getting a COVID-19 vaccine. (https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-cdc-covid-vaccine-deaths-910677348223). Consider that VAERS at BEST gets just 10% reporting of adverse events (rather generally accepted figure) and at worst, far, far less. If VAERS got 18K reports of deaths, and we accept the 10% figure, then we have at least 180,000 deaths in America from the vaccine. That’s just deaths. And that figure corresponds nicely with the conclusion in the article.
We now know that spike protein lingers in the body for weeks and months afterwards. We were told a lie, that it would be gone in a few days. Spike is a foreign protein to the immune system and is expressed on the surface of cells genetically altered by the vaccine to produce it. When the immune system detects the foreign alteration, it attacks, and your own body is the target. Hence, risk of autoimmune disease, organ failure, thrombosis, neurological disease and more.
I recently saw a report of a 53-year-old woman who had a normal mammogram in or about February 2021. She got vaccinated a few weeks later. Within 3 months, she had breast cancer, underwent double mastectomy and currently faces terminal disease. Vaccine death? Won’t be so reported. Was the cancer induced by the vaccine? Can’t say for sure. But there has been a clear rise in overall deaths post vaccine. Here is a post online from a pathologist and what she is seeing:
Summary:
Following widespread distribution and injection of Spike-producing therapeutics, Dr. Krüger noticed a number of changes on which she was asked to consult:
1. Younger patients are being seen, often 30- to 50-year- old.
2. Tumors are growing more aggressively and faster.
3. Tumors are larger.
4. Tumors exhibit heterogeneity.
5. Multifocal tumor growth and bilateral tumor growths are more frequent.
6. Co-temporal onset of more than one type of cancer.
7. Benign tumors have accelerated growth possibly signifying malignant transformation.
8. The physiologic process of inflammation was noted as a possible source of breast pain.
https://dailyclout.io/report-61-ute-kruger-md-breast-cancer-specialist-reveals-increase-in-cancers-and-occurrences-of-turbo-cancers-following-genetic-therapy-vaccines/
My colleagues have told me in the last week of an avalanche of patients they are treating with post vaccine decompensation. (Fortunately, with ozone and natural methods, they are generally doing quite well helping these poor souls).
Our pundits have missed what I consider as the most important analysis of vaccination: A comparison of ALL CAUSE mortality and morbidity in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. We’ve not seen such analysis in any part of the overall vaccine programs, and that is frightening, especially when questioning the program(s) gets you demonized, vilified, called a quack, thrown out of your academic position, censored and attacked by social media and government agencies. Simply said, in this matter and all matters from disease policies to war, follow the money trail.
To Your Excellent Health,
Robert Jay Rowen, MD
We actually have had patients like this before I was put away. Most all did very well.
Often clotting problems can be treated without drugs, using enzymes.