Clear Example of Mainstream Programming Methods in Health Issues - Misinformation Coming from "Them"

#13 2024 The Rowen Report

Dear Subscriber,

Davos WEF elites just delisted climate change as the world’s existential top threat to mis and dis-information.

Now, I happen to think that the greatest threat to the world is subtle programming and brainwashing of the population from childhood on, and which is coming from the self-styled WEF experts (remember, Trust the Experts!).

Here is an outstanding example of how the programming is being accomplished, and from mainstream CBS news. Please read and see how they are using words to program and “infiltrate” us rather than the other way around. I have copied and pasted their “NEWS” article below and in caps and brackets, inserted my thoughts/comments.

I would certainly like to read your thoughts/comments on the mainstream approach to programming you and your children. Please post some comments on this new piece with your interpretation. Thank you.

To Freedom for our Minds,

Robert Jay Rowen, MD

How fringe anti-science views infiltrated mainstream politics — and what it means in 2024 (CBS NEWS, January 18, 2024)

By Rates of routine childhood vaccination hit a 10-year low in 2023. That, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, puts about 250,000 kindergartners at risk for measles, which often leads to hospitalization** and can cause death. In recent weeks, an infant and two young children have been hospitalized amid an ongoing measles outbreak in Philadelphia that spread to a day care center.

It's a dangerous shift driven by a critical mass of people who now reject decades of science backing the safety and effectiveness of childhood vaccines. State by state, they've persuaded legislators and courts to more easily allow children to enter kindergarten without vaccines, citing religious, spiritual, or philosophical beliefs. [FALSE OPINION ONLY. WHERE IS DATA ON COMBINATIONS AND MULTITUDS OF VACCINES. THERE IS LIMITED SAFETY DATA ON SINGLE VACCINES. NONE ON THE ALL-CAUSE MORBIDITY AND MOTALITY OF THE VACCINE SCHEDULE

Growing vaccine hesitancy is just a small part of a broader rejection of scientific expertise that could have consequences ranging from disease outbreaks to reduced funding for research that leads to new treatments. "The term 'infodemic' implies random junk, but that's wrong," said Peter Hotez, a vaccine researcher at Baylor College of Medicine in Texas. "This is an organized political movement, and the health and science sectors don't know what to do." [WHAT? YOU MEAN THAT THE GARBAGE WE ARE FED ON FLUORIDE AND COVID, JUST 2 EXAMPLES ARE NOT ORGANIZED BY THE SHADOW DEEP STATE?]

Changing views among Republicans have steered the relaxation of childhood vaccine requirements, according to the Pew Research Center. Whereas nearly 80% of Republicans supported the rules in 2019, fewer than 60% do today. [WHY ATTACK THEM? PERHAPS THEY ARE AWAKENING TO THE LACK OF DATA ON THE CHILDHOOD VACCINE SCHEDULE AND THE HIGHER RATES OF SIDS AND AUTOIMMUNE DISEASES AND SKYROCKETING CHILD ILLNESS IN TODAY’S WORLD] Democrats have held steady, with about 85% supporting. Mississippi, which once boasted the nation's highest rates of childhood vaccination, began allowing religious exemptions last summer. Another leader in vaccination, West Virginia, is moving to do the same.

An anti-science movement [NOTE THE TERM “ANTI SCIENCE – CHOSEN TO STIR UP ANGST] picked up pace as Republican and Democratic perspectives on science diverged during the pandemic. Whereas 70% of Republicans said that science has a mostly positive impact on society in 2019, less than half felt that way in a November poll from Pew. [TRUE – WE HAVE LEARNED NOT TO TRUST THE (BIASED) SCIENCE] With presidential candidates lending airtime to anti-vaccine messages and members of Congress maligning scientists and pandemic-era public health policies, the partisan rift will likely widen in the run-up to November's elections. [AGAIN, PLEASE NOTE THE CHOICE OF INFLAMMATORY WORDS HERE}

Dorit Reiss, a vaccine policy researcher at the University of California Law San Francisco, draws parallels between today's backlash against public health and the early days of climate change denial. Both issues progressed from nonpartisan, fringe [IF YOU VEER FROM THE DOGMA OF THE MAINSTREAM, YOU ARE COINED “FRINGE”] movements to the mainstream once they appealed to conservatives and libertarians, who traditionally seek to limit government regulation. "Even if people weren't anti-vaccine to start with," Reiss said, "they move that way when the argument fits."

Even certain actors are the same. In the late '90s and early 2000s, a libertarian think tank, the American Institute for Economic Research, undermined climate scientists with reports that questioned global warming. [SO WHEN THEY CAN’T WIN WITH THE BOGUS ARGUMENTS ON CHILDHOOD VACCINES, OR COVID, THEY TOSS IN CLIMATE CHANGE AS THE GREAT CRISIS. BUT WEF JUST DOWNGRADED THIS CRISIS FROM LEADING THREAT TO THE WORLD AND REPLACED IT WITH “MISINFORMATION”] The same institute issued a statement early in the pandemic, grandly called the "Great Barrington Declaration." It argued against measures to curb the disease [YOU MEAN SHUTTERING BUSINESSES, HOME CONFINEMENT, SCHOOL CLOSURES?] and advised everyone — except the most vulnerable — to go about their lives as usual, regardless of the risk of infection. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, warned that such an approach would overwhelm health systems and put millions more at risk of disability and death from COVID. "Allowing a dangerous virus [WHERE WAS THE COVID VIRUS DANGEROUS TO THE GENERAL POPULATION EXCEPT IN THE PRESS? RISK MIGHT HAVE BEEN PRESENT IN OLD AGE HOMES AND THOSE WITH DIABETES. BUT CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS?] that we don't fully understand to run free is simply unethical," he said. [YOU MEAN YOUR BRAINWASHING HYPE AND FORCED VACCINE ON AN UNTESTED GENETIC ALTERATION WAS NOT “UNETHICAL”?]

Another group, the National Federation of Independent Business, has fought regulatory measures to curb climate change for over a decade. It moved on to vaccines in 2022 when it won a Supreme Court case that overturned a government effort to temporarily require employers to mandate that workers either be vaccinated against COVID or wear a face mask and test on a regular basis. Around 1,000 to 3,000 COVID deaths would have been averted in 2022 had the court upheld the rule, one study estimates. [AND WHAT ABOUT THE HUDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DEATHS AND INJURIES YOU ARE IGNORING FROM THE GENETIC JAB?]

Politically charged pushback [COUNTERING “MISINFORMATION”] may become better funded and more organized if public health becomes a political flashpoint in the lead-up to the presidential election. In the first few days of 2024, Florida's surgeon general, appointed by Republican presidential candidate and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, called for a halt to use of mRNA COVID vaccines as he echoed DeSantis' incorrect [INCORRECT???? BY GOLLY THAT IS ONE OF THE TRUEST STATEMENTS OF THE YEAR!!] statement that the shots have "not been proven to be safe and effective." And vaccine skeptic Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is running for president as an independent, announced that his campaign communications would be led by Del Bigtree, the executive director of one of the most well-heeled anti-vaccine organizations in the nation and host of a conspiratorial talk show. [OF COURSE THEY HAVE TO RAISE THE WORL “CONSPIRACY”. THAT IS HOW THEY TRY TO BEAT BACK THE TRUTH. THEY IS CLEARLY A CONSPIRACY. BUT “THEY” CONTROL THE PRESS, SO THE BEST THING THEY CAN DO IS DISCREDIT THE TRUTH BY LABELING IT “CONSPIRACY THEORY”, WHICH IS REALLY THE ONLY THING THEY CAN DO WHEN THE LIGHT IS SHINED ON THEM.] Bigtree posted a letter on the day of the announcement rife with misinformation, such as a baseless rumor that COVID vaccines make people more prone to infection [MISINFORMATIN? IT IS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN! WHAT “SCIENCE” ARE YOU CHERRY PICKING?]. He and Kennedy frequently pair health misinformation [“MISINFORMATION” AGAIN? SOUNDS LIKE YOU ARE IN CONSPIRACY WITH DAVOS IN CHANGING THE EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO THE PLANET FROM “CLIMATE CHANGE” TO “MISINFORMATION”] with terms that appeal to anti-government ideologies like "medical freedom" and "religious freedom." [OMG, THIS IS THE BEST. YOU MEAN MY GOD GIVEN RIGHT TO MY BODY AND MY HEALTH IS “ANTI-GOVERNMENT IDOLOGY” OR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM? I GUESS SO IF “GOVERNMENT” IS PHARMA IN DISGUISE.

**Now let’s look at the misinformation coming from the government moving goalposts. Above the report states that measles “often” leads to hospitalization. It doesn’t define “often”. So if you look at this site you will see the report that

1 in 5 unvaccinated who get measles will be hospitalized. Hmmm. Let’s see how does this current statement compare with the past, before vaccinations came on the scene? See the next paragraph.

From the CDC itself:

“In the decade before 1963 when a vaccine became available, nearly all children got measles by the time they were 15 years of age. It is estimated 3 to 4 million people in the United States were infected each year. Also each year, among reported cases, an estimated 400 to 500 people died, 48,000 were hospitalized, and 1,000 suffered encephalitis (swelling of the brain) from measles.”

Notice the moving goalposts. The CDC says in my day that the rate of hospitalization was 1 in 73, NOT 1 in 5 the current press is “misinforming” you. It was so “high” that I cannot recall even a single child of the 100%, in my day, who contracted measles get hospitalized.

And, is there any literature that confirms that not getting these usual childhood diseases is actually better overall for children that getting them and allowing these illness to tune up their immune systems? Why are “they” ignoring the skyrocketing chronic illness in our young?

Again, from CDC itself:

From 2008 through 2013, the proportion of pediatric patients with chronic conditions rose from 9.8% to 13.8% in this population. Compared with 2008, the adjusted odds of having a chronic condition in 2013 were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.3–1.6).

Is it not mis-information not to mention this CDC acknowledged rise in childhood chronic illness in the same totally biased CBS report?

Now let’s look at chronic illness in my day. This should be MOST telling an dis from the American Journal of Public health:

Data from the National Health Interview Survey indicate that the prevalence of activity-limiting chronic conditions among children under age 17 years doubled between 1960 and 1981, from 1.8 to 3.8 per cent. 

Look at the rise of chronic illness in the age of “safe” childhood vaccines. From 1.8% in 1960 to nearly 14% today.

Folks, we are in a fight for our survival from the mis and dis-information coming from “them” but who are blaming us for mis and disinformation. Seems they are blaming us for exactly what they are planning and doing. I believe I’ve seen this pattern from Progressives for decades in all avenues, from science to politics.

Hoping You’ll Post Your Comments,

Robert Jay Rowen, MD